Christopher Hall’s “Reading Scripture with the Church Fathers”

HallI’m reading through Christopher Hall’s Reading Scripture with the Church Fathers and in his introduction he very accurately describes most people’s feeling when it comes to reading the Fathers. He writes:

Why should we take the time to read them? Were they not all wild allegorizers? Did they really understand the Gospel?..Didn’t they believe in salvation by works? Isn’t their understanding more Greek or Roman than Christian?

These are interesting and honest questions – but they should be actual questions and not reasons to dismiss the Fathers outright without giving them a fair shake. The second question is of particular interest to me and something on which I will blog more extensively. In my class on Hermeneutics at Southeastern, Dr. Akin discussed the Church Fathers in rather broad terms and “allegorizers” was one of them. It was used with a negative connotation, in comparison to the “sober-minded” exegesis of…well, I guess himself. I think this question assumes two things: 1) All the Fathers were “wild allegorizers” and 2) Allegory is wrong. Neither is true. In fact, Andrew Louth has a chapter in Discerning the Mystery: An Essay on the Nature of Theology entitled Return to Allegory in which he argues for the validity (and necessity) of allegorical interpretation. It’s really a very good read and later I’ll blog on it more specifically.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “Christopher Hall’s “Reading Scripture with the Church Fathers”

  1. Josh, have you ever read Moises Silva’s Has the Church Misread the Bible?

    He does some fantastic things with ripping apart the traditional view of allegory = wrong in a brilliant way.

  2. jmcmanaway

    I haven’t, but I will. Thanks for the recommendation.

  3. Josh: I’m sure you’d love R. P. C. Hanson’s Allegory & Event : A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origen’s Interpretation of Scripture. BTW, I reviewed Hall’s book last year if you’re interested in checking it out.

    Mike: Thanks for bringing up Silva’s work. I started reading it but never finished. I’ll have to make sure to pick it up again real soon.

  4. Just dropping by to say hello, and look forward to more posts…

  5. Pingback: clayboy » de Wette, witter and wit: a ten-point round up of the blogs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s